Loading List

The Heir Hunters®

akg k702 vs beyerdynamic dt 880 mixing

I know that I will need a DAC/AMP for both of these, especially the DT 990, less so for the K702. Mike Senior, These light‑weight phones are remarkably comfortable, but a little loose on my head. Beyerdynamic DT 770 vs. AKG - K702. Still, there's quite a bit of detail, and the sound is fast enough to resolve the intricate internal layers of busy mixes. Hugh Robjohns, These phones are reasonably light and fairly comfortable. Based on our rating, both have the same overall rating of 7.5 out of 10. Compare Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro vs AKG K712 PRO headphones side-by-side. Mastering Essentials Part 4 - Mastering EQ: Balance, Don’t Match. Dynamics are portrayed very naturally. The voicing is pleasant enough to make them good for personal listening pleasure — an open, airy and non‑hyped sound, that makes you surprised at the incredibly revealing levels of detail, particularly in the critical mid‑range. In short, this isn't a pair of headphones I'd recommend for mixing purposes. For closed‑back designs, the Sony MDR 7509HDs seem to come out on top, with qualified plaudits also for the Audio-Technica ATH M50s. Mike Senior, The swivel‑mount, folding design is convenient, and I find the ATH M50s comfortable, even for longish periods. They're the second-least sensitive of all the headphones in this group (‑3dB), and offer moderate isolation. Slightly less sensitive than the reference AKG K702, they're also mildly coloured and veiled through the mid-range, with limited bass extension and squashed dynamics. They're accurate enough for reliable mixing, but the lack of physical stability puts me off. Isolation is fairly good, though. Very comfortable to wear for short periods, they do tend to squash the pinnae after a while. Matt Houghton. Tonally, you get the same kind of slightly mellow highs as on the HD650s, and while this avoids fatigue it's by no means lacking fine detail: you're made perfectly aware of early‑onset distortion or excessive sibilance, without them simultaneously chewing your ears off. PreSonus StudioLive 32SC Series III Mixing Console. vs. AKG K612 Pro. The earpads and cables aren't easily replaceable. When tracking, for example, closed‑back phones are the only viable option, because of the need to prevent monitoring spill reaching the mics, and external noise affecting the perceived monitor signal. The bass is cooler than from the HD650s, and while this might seem less 'nice' on first listen, I found it a fraction more extended, realistic and neutral, which meant that these phones presented a gentler learning curve. Sam Inglis, I'd far rather use a pair of DT250s than the classic DT100s in most cases. However, if you’re looking for the Gold Standard, the 880 comes in a close second place. Although the heaviest headphones here, they don't feel it, thanks largely to the huge ear cups: you don't wear these headphones so much as sit inside them! Performance is on a par with the Sennheiser HD600, but with a slightly fuller bottom end and more natural and accurate top end than Beyer's own DT770s. First Look: Pro Tools | Carbon. 5. Bass extension seemed good, though, and not deliberately hyped. Excellent dynamics and resolution. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition. In general, it seems that you still get what you pay for with headphones, because quality improved noticeably with cost in most cases. They're comfortable and give good dynamics, but the balance seems a little light at the bottom end. The mid‑range is quite prominent, which is good for some aspects of mixing, but a bit tiring for long periods. vs. AKG K712. These phones give poor isolation, but are very comfortable to wear thanks to the circumaural velour earpieces. I'm happy using them to sanity‑check mixes, and getting a rough mix‑balance, but wouldn't use them as my only mix tool. We do the majority of the mix on our Grimm speakers but the 880’s and the 702’s are fantastic phones also for an alternative “view” … The split headband helps to make them very stable, and the earpieces rotate. Quite bright, though not unworkably so, they give a fairly good representation of mix details and balance. They're slightly more sensitive (+1.5dB) than the AKG K702s (which I've used as the loudness reference for the other models). Despite the D900's price being on a par with top‑of‑the‑line open‑backed models, I reckon you'll get more mixing horsepower from the significantly less expensive Beyer DT250 or AKG K240 MkII. They're certainly not the most comfortable, but are the best choice if tracking in noisy environments or on the move. Paul White, The earpads are much more comfortable than those of AKG's K240, but these phones still feel bulky. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro. Transients come through nicely, though, and once you get used to them, it's perfectly possible to judge bass levels, although their brightness makes them a little fatiguing for long sessions. Hugh Robjohns, Offering a generally smooth, well‑balanced sound, and without an overly‑hyped top end, they're a little light in the deep bass, but the balance for late-night mixing isn't bad. These headphones are a first‑class mixing tool and I'd personally rather mix on them than on the vast majority of sub‑£500 active monitors! These large, bulky phones don't fold, and as they're open‑backed there's very poor isolation of external sounds. However, quality does seem to shine through, because the same suspects did crop up again and again. Dave Lockwood, With the same sensitivity as the HD600 and styled almost identically, the HD650 uses a slightly heavier and more robust cable, with the same cable connectors as the HD600 (either cable set could be used on either model, but the HD650 version seems to suffer less from handling noise). The 880 does have more bass and sparkle, so it does a little better with stuff like Rock, Progressive, Metal, and Electronica. My pick of the bunch — which I've bought since trying them out. These would be fine for tracking and good for mixing, but you'll need to become familiar with them before you stop making the high end too strong. They're quieter than many models, sound a bit muffled, and are not especially revealing. Audio-Technica ATH-M30X vs Audio-Technica ATH-M40X, Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro vs Sennheiser HD650, AKG Pro Audio K271 MKII vs Audio Technica ATH-M50, Beyerdynamic DT880 Pro vs Sennheiser HD598. The sound is slightly thin and congested, but tight, with a solid if somewhat underplayed bass. They offer moderate isolation and the same sensitivity as K702s. They're more sensitive than the DT880s. Mike Senior, The ATH M40s are comfortable and reasonably lightweight, and the earpieces can be rotated. Hugh Robjohns, These have a more transparent and open sound than AKG's closed‑back designs, but perhaps at the expense of true deep bass. There's almost as much internal mix detail as with the MDR7509s, yet balances seem more representative and stable, and there's an impressive sense of speed to higher‑frequency transients without things becoming fatiguing. vs. AKG K701. Years ago, closed-back phones tended to sound coloured ('boxy') and pretty dreadful, but were fine for cue feeds and checking that a recording was being made. vs. Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. Bonjour à tous. You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address. Not a fan of onboard DACs in general. Hugh Robjohns, I've used the MDR7509s [the previous model to the MDR7509 HD] for a long time, both for listening and for mixing. vs. Sennheiser HD6 Mix. If you want to get into mixing you will probably invest in some monitors sooner or later. I found their performance to be disappointing: they sounded most like vintage closed headphones — boxy, coloured, flat and lifeless. You get a tremendous sense of bass extension, but this appears to have been brought about in part by emphasising (or generating?) The head pressure is comparatively light, and although the fit doesn't feel precarious, isolation isn't particularly good. Given the overall tone, laid-back delivery of transients, decent isolation, and low spill‑levels, these are much better suited to overdubbing, where they put in a respectable performance for the price. I wouldn't recommend these for mixing, but they're fine for tracking and auditioning. Isolation didn't seem as good as with the Audio‑Technica ATH M50 or the Sony MDR7509 (presumably due to the semi‑open‑back design), but spill levels were low, and I'd be happy using these for overdubbing, as long as no loud click‑tracks were involved. Bass. Je vais passer quelques jours à les tester. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition. The sound is nicely balanced, with a realistically extended low end and natural, open‑sounding highs with plenty of overall detail and mid-range clarity. Mastering Essentials Part 3 - How loud should I master? ... Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition. There's also a good sense of stereo imaging. Matt Houghton, The folding, collapsible design of the SRH840s is similar to the MDR7509 HDs, while the single-sided cable connection includes a neat twist-lock connector. Hugh Robjohns, Ultrasone Pro 900.The Pro900s offer moderate isolation and are more sensitive than most (+3dB). I preferred Sennheiser's more affordable HD251 II for overdubbing, given its smoother high end and better isolation/spill performance. 43. points. Mike Senior, The HD650s are outwardly similar to the HD600s and are again very comfortable. This is achieved by using revolutionary flat-wire voice coils and a patented Varimotion two-layer diaphragm. The Beyerdynamic DT880 has a lot of the same features as the AKG K702 but is a lot less expensive, coming in at around $200 less on the list price. Every week, someone on the SOS forums starts a thread asking "which headphones are the best for recording and mixing?” but the answer isn't simple. As with any monitoring system, you need to be familiar with the sound of your headphones to make accurate judgments, so it may also be worth reading Mike Senior's article (/sos/sep08/articles/referencecd.htm) about assembling useful reference material. They'd make decent tracking cans too, with the same caveat about the brightness. They have quite a 'shouty' voicing, with a prominent high mid‑range and quite subdued bass. vs. Philips Fidelio X3. These are Beyer's best-kept secret! We really are into the realm of diminishing returns, though, and only the seriously fanatical will feel comfortable justifying the considerable additional cost. Paul White, The firm head pressure and circumaural earpads give good isolation, but leakage is surprisingly high. They're well built, very robust and rugged, and sit on the ear instead of around it — but they manage to provide extremely good isolation. The tone feels quite balanced, but with an upper mid-range hardness, emphasised at higher volumes, which I found slightly fatiguing — so be careful to maintain a fairly consistent monitoring level if you're going to use these as a mixing reference. For recording on location or working in noisy environments the Sennheiser HD251 II seemed popular, for their combination of excellent performance, build quality and exclusion of external sound. They're very comfortable and secure, although the split lead feeding both earpieces won't appeal to all. 15 comments ... Mastodon typically suffer from awful broadcast mixing but thought this was bang on. Archived. vs. Sennheiser HD 280 Pro. If I didn't already own a pair of HD650s, the DT880s would be a no‑brainer purchase. The mid‑range frequency balance seems very true, with tonality differences between different mixes and spoken‑word recordings shining out, and balances feeling solid and dependable. Lighter and with a more secure fit, they provide a clearer, though still warm, tone, with better‑controlled bass — but they retain the good rejection of outside noise and control over leakage. Is it really about new sounds these days.... Cheap and Nasty handheld vocal microphone. On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for long listening sessions. Sam Inglis, These are comfortable, although perhaps a little weighty. Mike Senior, Supplied with a large, padded case, these are very comfortable and stable to wear for long periods, and offer moderate isolation of external sounds. On the flip side, the 880 is a phenomenal headphone without a doubt. The sound is smooth and flattering, with capacious low end, but low‑frequency transients seem slow off the mark and slightly smeared in time, influencing my ability to judge balance between bass and kick. Bass is not hyped at all, making them seem almost bass‑light when A/B'ing against some others, but I find their smoothly extended LF to be a more accurate representation of what's really there. By contrast, the DT 880 is a mixing/reference headphone that has a very flat, neutral response. The DT 880 are more enjoyable, while the K702 will probably help produce better recordings. It's possible to mix quite satisfactorily on these headphones, although I tend to use open‑backed cans in preference when possible. They're as comfortable and stable to wear as the HD600s, but with a fractionally more extended bottom end, lower distortion, closer matching tolerances and a usefully higher (6dB) peak SPL. Paul White, The HD280s have a very tight fit, giving good isolation, and are reasonably comfortable. Hugh Robjohns, These are versatile phones that offer a decent tonal balance, albeit with a slightly scooped mid-range, and I liked the non‑fatiguing high end: a solid studio workhorse for tracking or routine mix checking. Equally as sensitive as the Sennheiser models (at +4dB), they're also very comfortable and stable to wear for long periods. beyerdynamic DT 990 pro VS. AKG K702 Advice. All rights reserved. The least sensitive of the group, they require more drive than the others, placing greater demands on the quality and capability of the headphone amp. Ultrasone: Audio Limited +44 (0)1494 511 711. The K702s are a powerful and discriminating mix tool, and for my money outgun any active monitor of a similar price for mixing purposes. vs. AKG K712 Pro. A really hard decision!! They offer a very similar sonic performance to the MDR7509s, although with a slightly richer bottom end. Je n’ai pas résisté à l’envie de faire une petite écoute préliminaire sur chacun d’eux. If you can swap over the phones quickly enough, the HD650s seem to produce an even smoother, more natural sound, with a wonderful depth to the low end. Then you shouldn't get neither. More sensitive than either of the other A-T designs, the ATH M50s also offer fairly good isolation. They give good isolation and are fairly sensitive, at +2dB relative to the AKG K702s. Close. beyerdynamic DT-880 Pro Headphones 250 O... beyerdynamic DT-880 Pro Headphones 250 Ohm (490970) with Full Size Headphone Case, Headphone Stand … Mike Senior, The DT250s are comfortable, stable and very robust, and offer moderate isolation from external sound. Paul White, These offer a secure fit, although the earcups are fairly small and a bit uncomfortable after prolonged use. I wouldn't recommend these phones for mixing, but I liked their warm sound for overdubbing (isolation and spill were above par) as long as I didn't drive them to ear‑bleeding levels. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers. We compare a selection of the best models. The HD800 is undoubtedly more accurate and better built than the HD650, but not three times better than something that is probably already 95 percent of the way to perfection anyway. Why is AKG K712 Pro better than Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO? We invited manufacturers to send models they thought suitable for mixing, mastering or location recording and received a selection of closed‑back and open‑back designs. AKG K712 Pro vs Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO. They don't really cut it for mixing, where the lack of detail and overblown, pillow‑like bass militate against useful balance or EQ decisions, and I can't recommend the DT150s in that role, given the competition. The DT990 is more of a “fun”, bass-heads headphone, meant for pure listening enjoyment. They work well for mixing, with good transferability to speakers, but aren't comfortable to wear on long mix sessions. The sound quality is very open: brighter than HD650s and a little lighter on the bass, but with a similar feel. Although fader levels felt slightly easier to judge further up the frequency range, and transients were nippier than on other cans aimed at overdubbing, I was unable to make reliable tonality judgements. Isolation and spill is naturally compromised, but you get a very open sound, albeit tilted spectrally towards the upper registers (such that I preferred listening at lower levels). Paul White, I found these foldable phones quite flimsy and uncomfortable. At Sound Liaison we have been using Beyer Dt 880 and Akg 702 to great satisfaction when checking for phase and such problems. The Sennheiser HD800s were by far the most expensive on test, and probably the best — although not all of us had the opportunity to audition them, as they were only just becoming available as we wrote this article. Beyerdynamic DT 770 vs. 880 [Definitive Guide] Sennheiser HD 600 vs. HD 6XX [Definitive Guide] AKG K240 600 Ohm vs. 55 Ohm K702 is detachable cable version of AKG's fair decade old K701, aimed at highly analytical sound with big soundstage and neutral bass. They're very comfortable and OK for mixing once you get used to them: the subjective sound is quite similar to that of my studio speakers, but perhaps a hint more 'toppy'. They have well-padded and large ear cups that fit comfortably around most listeners' ears. This made it tricky to judge balance for bass instruments objectively or evaluate low‑end and low mid-range EQ adjustments — and I'm unsure how well experience could compensate. They exhibit a sparkle at the top end that flatters acoustic performances, and would be great if you prefer a brighter monitoring tone. Paul White, A fairly lightweight headset with good head pressure gave a secure fit, although spill levels weren't as low as from some closed‑back designs. For instance, plugged into the Sony SCD-X777ES' headphone output , the K702s sound almost nasal while the 600 Ω DT 880s sound much better. The ear-pad material generated a lot of rustling from small head movements, too. The bass is at first impressive, but on closer inspection is a little misleading. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. Hugh Robjohns, The comfortable DT770s offer a solid, punchy sound, with a good balance of detail and smoothness. Despite the fatiguing tonal crispness, the high end came across as messy and lacking in resolution from a mixing perspective. However, it can be hard to pinpoint the right levels for lead and bass instruments. The mid-range and high frequencies seemed clearer, but I found it not quite as easy to differentiate individual sounds in complex or noisy mixes as with the AKG K240 MkIIs. They're not dissimilar to the ATH M40s. Audio Post. As with the otherwise dissimilar MDR7509s, this detail made it easy to undermix lead vocals in particular, but you'd learn to compensate for this after a while. vs. AKG K701. AKG K141 MKII vs AKG K240 – Which Ones are Better? Is it really about new sounds these d... Re: Cheap and Nasty handheld vocal microphone. You get very good dynamics, resolution and a strong bass end. Hugh Robjohns, The head pressure initially feels firm, but you get a confidence‑inspiring fit that remains comfortable after long sessions. Close to being as good as it gets with open‑backed headphones and certainly very usable for mixing, given some practice. The bass end is subjectively bigger than the DT880s, and, to my ears at least, perhaps a little uneven, as I seem to mix slightly bass‑light on them. We also added models we already owned to that list. They'd be good affordable tracking headphones, and perhaps OK for late‑night mixing if you got used to them. Communication of relative balance seemed compromised too, especially when focusing on bass, kick, vocal, and treble percussion levels. The HD280 is probably my best budget recommendation for tracking or mixing if you have to go the closed‑back route. The low end goes down a long way, and although not quite as tuneful as some of the open‑backed models, nevertheless presents a pretty trustworthy balance. Hello,I have been struggling with a decision which is where to get a Beyerdynamic DT990 PRO, Audio-Technica ATH-AD700 or a AKG K-701, the primary use of which will be gaming 70% (all genre of games), music 20% (mainly dubstep, alternative modern rock and some pop) and films 10%. The circumaural earpads fitted my ears without cramping, but there may not be quite enough space for some. Sam Inglis. There are two broad design categories, open‑back and closed‑back, and each has advantages and disadvantages. AKG K712 vs Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro. They were good for picking up problems with a kick/bass relationship that I hadn't spotted on other phones. 4800Hz higher high-frequency ... AKG K712 Pro. Re: Synthesizers. For me, the DT880s are the top of the tree: they're not quite as subjectively engaging as the Sennheiser HD650s on a musical level, but are the closest I've got to forgetting that I'm listening on headphones! These are OK for mixing, with good resolution, and good for tracking. The frequency response seems very well balanced, and offers excellent bass extension, with only the very lowest sub‑bass feeling in any way underpowered. These are good workhorses, other than the comfort issue: probably best suited to tracking. Dynamics and mid-range clarity are good. ... these headphones will give you a great amount of entertaining listening as well as critical one for mixing or recording with every single shade of sound. The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. And of course AKG Being a producer and needing a good mixing can, I have really narrowed down my next purchase to either the HD 600 or DT 880 Pro. These are much more useful for mixing, though, because despite an initially misleading low mid-range prominence, the bass is quite well extended and clean, so you can make useful balance judgements. Sony MDR-7510 vs Audio Technica ATH-M50 – Which Headphones are Better? Tonality was anything but neutral, with a bloated low end and lots of extreme high-frequency, and I found this almost impossible to adjust to (more like listening to a car stereo than to a monitoring system!). More of a problem was that the balance of the mid-range frequency spectrum seemed lumpy, adding an unwelcome element of guesswork to both EQ and balance decisions. EQ decisions made with these seem to translate well to speakers. vs. AKG K702. It’s more comfortable than the 701, and has a mid-range that becomes more intimate and enjoyable. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro. The fit is firm and comfortable. Paul White, This closed‑back design has a secure, comfortable circumaural fit, with good isolation and spill stoppage. Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro. The HD650s are fitted with a fixed quarter‑inch plug, but supplied with a short 3.5mm adaptor cable. The tone is a bit shy at the very low end, while the low mid‑range feels emphasised, misrepresenting some bass‑instrument balances, but the bass reproduction itself is clean enough that you can learn to compensate for this. ... Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition. The DT 880 look similar to the DT 990 PRO but have enough unique touches to feel like a different design. There's a hi‑fi flavour, emphasising the bass and high end, which tends to be flattering rather than revealing. The transducers are hand selected to be matched within ±1dB. I expect pleasingly full tones from Audio-Technica headphones, and wasn't disappointed, but found them a little fatiguing in the upper mid-range at higher levels. You lose some ground to the AKG K240 MkII in terms of laying bare mix details and dissecting layered sounds, but the DT250s represent a better all‑round choice if you need headphones both for overdubbing and mixing. Paul White, The small supra‑aural earcups exert a fair bit of pressure on the ears, and are a touch uncomfortable after a while. I was expecting more, and couldn't justify the expense for studio tracking or mixing. I particularly liked the bass response, which was very smooth, extended and full, translating well onto larger systems. Mike Senior, I found the 'smile curve' frequency response of the D900 Pros tiring and problematic for mixing, while the foam ear-pads had a tendency to fall off. Paul White, The new HD800s aren't quite as sensitive as the other high‑end Sennheisers, but they're the pinnacle of fastidious headphone design (the result of two years of R&D effort to come up with an innovative edge‑driven transducer design), and are truly stunning in every way: they really do raise the benchmark for studio headphones. The ear pads and lead are easily replaceable, and there's a clever 3.5/6.25mm adapter. I hadn't used these before the group test, but could definitely get used to their exceptionally analytical mid-range. Sam Inglis, The combination of light weight and a well‑judged head‑pressure gave a really secure and comfortable fit for the circumaural earcups, which deliver decent isolation and fairly low spill levels. You get very good isolation and a well‑balanced spectrum that's nicely extended at both ends, with accurate dynamics and a good sense of stereo imaging. Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates & SOS. It's a wonderfully unfatiguing sound that I could work with for hours, and they're physically comfortable too. A note to potential buyers: Upon further research, the HD600’s are the better option for mixing. Although comfortable, they're one of the heaviest in the group. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE Q701 in my AKG Q701 vs. K701 COMPARISON!! Re: Why would Kurzweil have moved 'forward' by removing... Why would Kurzweil have moved 'forward' by removing dig... Should the side channel always be lower than the mid ch... One Synth Challenge V - The Filter Strikes Back! Mike Senior, Fostex T50RPThese have old‑fashioned styling and felt flimsy. The Beyerdynamic DT880 proved popular.Although only semi‑open, these exclude a reasonable amount of ambient sound. They're comfortable and not at all over‑bright, so you can listen for a long time without getting tired. The tone was warm, going on muffled and boxy, and detail wasn't thick on the ground. Win! The trade‑off is that these cans are super‑solid on your head and give excellent isolation of external sounds and very low spill levels: they'd be ideal for critical overdubbing tasks. I'm looking forward to this stunningly good transducer technology trickling back down into more affordable models in the months and years to come. AKG. I preferred the low end of these phones over the similarly priced MDR7509s, but the latter outgun the Beyerdynamics when it comes to picking apart the upper regions of the mix — so it's tricky to say which will give you the best mix. The circular ear cups are semi open as opposed to the open design of the DT 990 which combined with the more premium, metal enclosures makes the DT 880 look much more expensive than their price range.

Channel 6 Weather Warning, Taho Delivery Cavite, Fenugreek Seeds Canada, How To Measure Waist, Federal Reserve Pension Plan Formula, Belmont Tennis Court, Ge Washer Model Number List,